Wednesday, August 13, 2008 at 9:08PM
This summer has quickly become the summer of the monsters! There have been three reported sightings of three monsters. Two of them were found dead and one was caught on tape! I guess these sightings by police and celebs in the Hampton's are much more reputable than some hick in the back woods on meth saying a Chupacabra ate their babeh. So I've decided to dive into these claims and make up my own mind on if they are false or not...
#1. El Chupacabra
So somewhere in Texas a police man came across this animal he believes to be the infamous Chupacabra! Here's a video with the recording of the Chupacabra and the police man's claim.
My verdict? FALSE!!!!!!
Why? Well they said them selves that an animal carcass was found that looked exactly like this and it was a kind of wolf. It really does look like a wolf that mated with a bore! All they saw was this weird looking animal running. They did not see it sucking blood out of another poor animal, nor was it covered in blood. Maybe it's just a mutated dog?
#2. The Montauk Monster
So the animal above reportedly washed up on the Hampton shores in the end of July. No one knows what it is called but it has been deemed the Montauk Monster. There is only one photo of it and no body left aside from claims some old man took it and said he was going to mount it on his wall (ew!!). The picture gives no size reference, clues to where it was actually taken, and very well may be photoshopped. Of course eye witnesses came forth after it had been reported. They always do.
Source : Fox News
My verdict? Who the hell knows?!
This thing could be a number of things. It could be a water logged sea turtle without it's shell, it could be some sort of ugly bird water logged that has had it's feathers plucked out by hungry fish, or it could be just someone's idea of a practical joke. Who knows? Maybe if the body turned up and the DNA was examined I could make up my mind of what this thing is if it does in fact exist.
#3. Big Foot!!!
So two "big foot hunters," by the names of Matthew Whitton (AKA Gary Parker) and Rick Dyer, claim to have found Big Foot's body in the northern woods of Georgia. They have one (and yes I stress that) photo of the body and the exact location of the finding is not being released to protect the creatures. They will not release any more pictures or information until a press conference on Friday in Palo Alto, California aside from the following...
"Here are some of the vital statistics on the “Bigfoot” body:
*The creature is seven feet seven inches tall.
*It weighs over five hundred pounds.
*The creature looks like it is part human and part ape-like.
*It is male.
*It has reddish hair and blackish-grey eyes.
*It has two arms and two legs, and five fingers on each hand and
five toes on each foot.
*The feet are flat and similar to human feet.
*Its footprint is sixteen and three-quarters inches long and five and three-quarters inches wide at the heel.
*From the palm of the hand to the tip of the middle finger, its hands are
eleven and three-quarters inches long and six and one-quarter inches wide.
*The creatures walk upright. (Several of them were sighted on the same day that the body was found.)
*The teeth are more human-like than ape-like.
*DNA tests are currently being done and the current DNA and photo evidence will be presented at the press conference on Friday, August 15th."
Sources : The Inquisitr and SearchingForBigFoot.com
My verdict? It's a total hoax!!!!
Why? There is one damn picture that looks like a bear in a mask. Why wouldn't they have taken and posted pictures of the other sightings that occurred on the day the body was found? I doubt that would have given them any less credit or ruined their press conference. If there are so many of them in the woods they were found in why are they not commonly seen? I doubt these woods have zero people traffic. It's seems unlikely that the first body to be found would not have been found sooner. Especially since the east coast has been inhabited for so much longer than the rest of America. I know what you are thinking. "Well Shawnee IF it is a hoax why would they hold a press conference with such confidence?" That is a good question. Maybe because these people are attention starved crazies? I will gladly take back that comment if this all pans out and it's proven to be true. I seriously doubt any of this is factual.